Re: NLH Decision – “more angles than a protractor!”
[ QUOTE ]
I think that player B's stating "Call" was not out of turn, being that "there [was] a brief dispute regarding how many chips were cut off." I'm assuming the dispute was over how many chips Player A had released when player B stated "call." Therefore, Player A's action ended when Player B said call, thus I would rule that the call stands. Action ended when player A stopped cutting chips, which is also when Player B said call.
[/ QUOTE ]
You can not end somebody elses action by stating call. There for your reasoning is a bit strange. You came up with the right ruling thou.
|