[Rockatansky]

I assumed (incorrectly in this case) that my opponent would raise with an Ace and an Ace only. If I had re-raised all-in and he in fact held an Ace, then I would have actually lost money versus just calling because of the rake.

I guess you could argue that I should always go all-in here, because the times that he doesn't hold an Ace and calls will more than make up for the times that he does and that I lose extra money in rake. However, I honestly thought there was no way that he would raise without the Ace.