Multi-tabling TAG sharks more important than you think
One thing I just realized is that a Multi-tabling shark will play 7-10 tables whereas a fish will only play 1. So this means that the Multi-tabling shark pays on average 7-10 times the rake that a fish would pay. I would think that this fact (that the sharks play a lot more) makes the sharks for more important customers to Party than the fish. You could make a weak argument that the sharks drive the average pot size lower, lowering the rake, but at higher stakes (1/2 NL and above) where the rake is for the most part capped, this really doesnt matter.
If you have 60,000 fish and 10,000 sharks on Party that want rakeback, the 10,000 sharks suddenly become just as important if not more important than the 60,000 fish, since they play far more tables. However you won't see it in the "number of players" statistic.
|