View Single Post
  #3  
Old 10-11-2005, 02:35 AM
StellarWind StellarWind is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 704
Default Re: The case against RB

[ QUOTE ]
Obviously rake should be defined as the amount a player actually paid, not as 10% (or whatever) of the total amount paid at the table.

[/ QUOTE ]
A poker network is going to have an agreement governing how the different skins divide the rake when their players share a table. That agreement will inevitably determine how rakeback and other affiliate payments are computed. No skin wants to pay an affiliate for revenue that the network never credited them with.
Reply With Quote