Re: is this bad?
interesting river (though completely standard until then.)
i think i migth check it through in the heat of the moment just because i'd be so confused, but i think it's wrong.
hand reads: MP called two on the flop and didn't cap preflop. so I'm thinking he either has a Q or he squarely has AK. But he didn't come alive on the turn when he hit his A if he had AK so I think a Q is more likely.
CO showed strength on the flop (indicating he had a Q or some other strong hand) then bet out again when the A hit, indicating it improved his hand. But 100% of the hands that the A improve will bet the river IMO, and the only hands that make sense for him are AQ which is inconsistent on the river.
So I really can't put anyone on a hand that beats me with any confidence. that why i think it's a bet.
|