[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Pokerroom is the suckiest suck site that ever sucked my friend. Pokerroom? Oh good lord no.....
And you said that the Crypto sites were nearly as soft as Party? Ummmmmmm....that is not correct.
[/ QUOTE ]
This is why it's so hard to decide what sites are actually loose and to what degree. If you go to a site like
http://www.pokertop100.com/ it rates InterPoker's looseness of games at 80/100, same as for Party (I think only Pacific is higher). But ratings from this site don't really jive with the BW grading of the different sites/games, and I don't know how much stock I'd put into those anyway.
Thanks for the input though.
[/ QUOTE ]
Well, back in the day Interpoker was loose - before they were overrun by bonus whores. Things are always changing in the world of online poker. For instance Paradise used to be the #1 site and was also notorious for tight agressive pros - but most of them moved away to Party and other places and now Paradise is tied to a sportsbook and can have some wild eyed games rockin' at times. Don't depend on some websites "reviews" of the different poker sites, just play there a while and see if you like it. For instance you may like Pokeroom, some people do, and lots of others think it is very, very, bad (They recently raised their rake through the roof for instance) just play where you like to play, not where some "review site" says has good games.