[Daliman]

[ QUOTE ]
I'd rather have Mike come and give updates and not answer questions than get nothing from him at all.

Party Poker's leaders have consistently proven to be very adept at decisionmaking. Laugh if you want, and you will because you are self-loathing, but this move was great for them. Party Poker does not and should not care whether or not it is possible for us to earn a livelihood there.

-Michael

[/ QUOTE ]

What exactly makes you say this? Do you not understand that without winning players playing 4+ tables, Party would have EASILY 60% less "Players" at their tables? If no one made any $$$ in their games, then obviously no one would continue to play there in time. THis is why in places like Aruba, Poker is crap. They rake $15 max from pots, the game is unbeatable, and there are hardly any tables for a place where I'm pretty sure poker is completely legal everywhere. Winning players are not only wanted, but NECESSARY for the viability of ANY poker room. THis is not a casino.

Very surprising, coming from you...