Re: To believe or not to believe - that is the quesiton.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, just like it except none of the made up bullsh!t.
[/ QUOTE ]
I wish I had the passion for my religion that you have against religion. Ironic.
[/ QUOTE ]
You wanted this type of response based on this thread you created, and I'll bet you wanted it just for a comment like that.
[/ QUOTE ]
No, I honestly thought there was a difference between athiests and agnostics. I wish I was as good at game theory as you suggest.
[/ QUOTE ]
You know, you could have just asked that question rather than your mocking original post -- ("Until all the “geniuses” agree to what to believe (think) how are we mortals supposed to know? Please, we are looking for guidance from you. Get back to us ASAP.")
[/ QUOTE ]
I thought it was a valid point. Pardon my ignorance of atheism/agnosticism. From previous posts here on the forum, I got the impression that there was a difference. I think I have edified someof us enough regarding some misconceptions about (my )religion (not saying the edification amounted to anything of importance) that I am entitled to a faux pas.
Can we agree on this: That to believe that “there is absolutely no possibility of a God” is as “silly” a thinking as how agnostics view what believers think (them silly) about their religion?
|