That discipleship comment was harsh lol.
But sorry sexdrugsmoney I have to side with reason on this one.
Here was Sklanky's stance!! If Newton had been brought up to speed with the last 350 years of science and he STILL believed in god Sklansky said he would want a psych evaluation of Newton and if he still believed in GOD, Sklansky wanted a debate. Am I wrong? Read it again.
It is ok to be wrong.
Be open minded to the fact that just because your views differ from Sklansky's, neither one of you will be right 100% of the time.
People not understanding this is really starting to clutter up the threads.
Smart people arguing on and on and ON after they have clearly been proven wrong and then the name calling....................... Isn't this everything we hate in other people?