[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

But please, don't ever compare David Sklansky to Issac Newton ever again. Ever.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know, 6 months of research by Sklansky could make them equals. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
Hey I'm not trying to belittle Sklansky he helped teach me the game of poker. If he saw that comparison even he wouldn't dignify it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh really? [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

That thread is a joke built on your hypothetical. I love how you pull it out every now and again and use it as asome sort of evidence that "Sklansky thinks he's smarter than Newton" (adding your little smirking emoticon each time, too). All that link says is that Sklansky has 350 years of other people's research and thinking to reflect on that Newton didn't have in the 1600s.

Stop using that thread to attempt to discredit DS, it is getting pathetic and only discredits yourself.