[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Has anyone even read the "charge"? There are no real facts in it, usually an indictment sort of "relies" on facts to even be presented, they are strangely and profoundly missing in this "case". Especially involving Mr. Delay.
[/ QUOTE ]
Have
you read the charge? The parties involved, the exact dollar amounts, the money trail through the various accounts in question, and a photocopy of one of the checks don't count as facts?
Here is the link to the indictment:
http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2005/images/0...indictment.pdf
Please note as well that this is an indictment, not a conviction, thus a landslide of rock-solid airtight evidence is not going to be included. That's what the trial will be for.
[/ QUOTE ]
Count the times that you see Delay mentioned. Count the number of specific FACTS that are presented about Delay. 3 total times, that's all. Then the "facts" they present are that he knew about it somehow and approved it somehow. It is further comical that even if he HAD done what is charged, it wasnt a crime at the time. Shame on him for not breaking the law.