[GrannyMae]

I've repeatedly heard the arguement from several others that rakeback will raise the total-rake for poker rooms online and that it is a negative thing. I highly disagree with this and wanted my thoughts to be known.


i wish nothing but the best to the operators of this forum. i also respect your opinion joe. however, i don't think anyone can rationally argue that rakeback does not increase rake rates. if there is an argument that disputes this, i would love to hear it.

the bottom line is rakeback is here to stay, and the hope is that rake for online play will always be lower than the rake for live play.

even if rakeback has caused rakeback tolerant sites to have higher rake than rakeback intolerant sites (stars, paradise), it is still MUCH cheaper than B&M. also, if players use applied knowledge to improve their game, the rake being slightly higher at one site versus another is irrelevant as long as it stays under B&M rates.

for the record, i am an affiliate that does not do rakeback. it is not because i think it is evil, it is just because i think it is not worth my time for the margins that the bigger affiliates are working on. i'm not big enough to compete, but i accept the fact that my marketing has to be toward non-pros.

i did not really want to get involved here joe, but to say that rakeback does not exasperate higher rakes is just plain silly. but, it is not high enough for the typical pro to be worried about IMO.