[fuzzbox]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think limping with QQ (unless the stack is thin, like 40 bb) utg is always wrong, with KK or AA it might be a good play to limp if the conditions is right.

[/ QUOTE ]
Why is it always wrong. What, exactly, is wrong with it?

[/ QUOTE ]
I think it's wrong because it's not strong enought to limp-reraise with (and giving away that you have a big PP) but definitely strong enough to raise with (and prob. call a reraise).

Some other arguments can you find in the other answers in this thread.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why is it strong enough to raise and call a reraise, but not strong enough to limp and then reraise? What is the difference between those two, other than in case 2 - we have a chance to win the pot right there.

Also - hero never mentioned limping with the intention of reraising. He is just limping.

What does raising UTG in a full ring game do ? Does it give away that you have a big pp (or AK). What does limp-reraising do thats different?

And more to the point - what, exactly, is WRONG with limping, how does it lose me money, or not make me more money when I limp QQ up front ? Thats the part Im interested in ... can you explain how this works.