</font><blockquote><font class="small">Svar till:</font><hr />
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Svar till:</font><hr />
By the way, you are arguing statistics with a professional mathematician. Your game selection sucks, and your bluff has been exposed.
[/ QUOTE ]
LOL... Well I certainly wouldn't want to be arguing with you then, but I also certainly would enjoy seeing you add some value to this conversation, other than trying to dispute the 40/60. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
[/ QUOTE ]
40-60 as sniper says is impossible. Short-term it should be 40-60, but not long term. The 60% who lose short term will not lose everytime they play. Some of the 60% will move over to the winners lounge and some of the 40% will move to the losers lounge. Because of the rake, more of the 40% will be losers long term.