Here's one of those hands that just leaves me in disbelief. Did I play it incorrectly? the SB has been aggressive ever since he built his stack, raising with any paint, but looking back, he folded a lot to my turn bluffs and semi bluffs. Should I have known I was walking into a trap? Was my check on the turn, trying to set a trap myself, wrong? I bet the flop HOPING for him to reraise me thinking I was bluffing at the 9's, because I would always take a stab at the pot, and if reraised I folded to him. It was all working out till the stupid 6, even if i bet the turn, i dont think i would have folded if a 6 hit.... thanks in advance.

PokerStars Game #2714790668: Tournament #13311938, Hold'em No Limit - Level VI (100/200) - 2005/10/02 - 23:38:41 (ET)
Table '13311938 1' Seat #5 is the button
Seat 1: bahorst (3755 in chips)
Seat 2: MannyFresh24 (2130 in chips)
Seat 5: throughhiker (395 in chips)
Seat 6: Jesster_mac (7220 in chips)
Jesster_mac: posts small blind 100
bahorst: posts big blind 200
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to bahorst [Qh 9d]
MannyFresh24: folds
throughhiker: folds
Jesster_mac: calls 100
Jesster_mac said, "it was good time to raise w/hiker sitting"
bahorst: raises 400 to 600
bahorst said, "must have"
Jesster_mac: calls 400
*** FLOP *** [9h Ts 9c]
Jesster_mac: checks
bahorst: bets 700
Jesster_mac: calls 700
*** TURN *** [9h Ts 9c] [6h]
Jesster_mac: checks
bahorst: checks
*** RIVER *** [9h Ts 9c 6h] [2d]
Jesster_mac: checks
bahorst: bets 800
Jesster_mac: raises 1000 to 1800
bahorst: raises 655 to 2455 and is all-in
Jesster_mac: calls 655
bahorst said, "lol"
*** SHOW DOWN ***
bahorst: shows [Qh 9d] (three of a kind, Nines)
Jesster_mac: shows [9s 6s] (a full house, Nines full of Sixes)