[tiltaholic]

[ QUOTE ]
Hyper-aggressive play won money at .5/1, 1/2, and 1/2 short.

Hyper-aggressive play does not win money at 2/4.

Be careful with trying to explode all over the loose passives there. Sometimes more passive lines win more money.

I don't know if you play hyper-aggressively. I did and it took me 5k hands to figure out that that isn't the way to beat 2/4.

At 3/6 short, however, I think that hyper-aggressive play is best.

[/ QUOTE ]

i'm also going to second this (of course, i shouldn't need to since we all know shadow is god's gift to poker).

i didn't change my play much from 1/2 to 2/4 to 3/6 (all full) and anecdotally based on only 30k of 1/2, 30k of 2/4, and 12k of 3/6 an aggressive style of play has worked very well for me at 1/2 and 3/6 but not at 2/4.

i should say that i probably tilted off at least 250 bb at 2/4 in frustration so who knows...

i think it does boil down to me not taking more passive lines against the very passive players (ie, i wasn't paying enough attention to them)

of course, this is all a small sample so ymmv.