[etgryphon]

[ QUOTE ]
The defining characteristics of the militia as originally understood were compulsory service by all eligible men, training and organization, occasional service as required, and strong responsibility to local command. I don't think there can be a private militia. I don't consider small groups of self-styled militiamen, taking target practice in the woods while sporting battle fatigues, and spouting their own brand of libertarian patriotism, a militia, except in the minds of those pariticipating.

[/ QUOTE ]

So what is the difference between your definition of a "militia" and standing army controlled by the government?

Would you be willing to allow the states the ability to define what a "militia" is as it pertains to the 2nd Amendment?

I say this because the VA Constitution(where I live) and other states allow for "unorganized militia" which fall under loose groups of citizens who swear to uphold the State constitution and the laws of the land.

-Gryph