Re: For those of you that play the Party 1/2 (low content)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
why not just datamine it?
[/ QUOTE ]
Haven't had a Party account. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
[/ QUOTE ]
here: (Actual stats
Random guy
21,224 hands
VP$IP: 31.18
PFR: 19
BB/100: 2.90
Sessions: 126 (seems like he's playing short-handed alot)
Winnings: $120K+
This guy is the biggest winner on my datamine of 100/200.
There are people with winrates of 5-6 BB/100 over 6-8K hands though, so yes 1BB/100 is quite possible.
[/ QUOTE ]
Interesting. I wouldn't think that game runs short very often being that there are only 2 tables with long lists to get on it.
His stats seem extra DERBish to me for full table play, making me just scratch my head. I assume he is just on a heater, as it's a pretty small sample size. Nevertheless, there are a lot of these DERB types surviving/winning so maybe I need to relearn poker. BTW, not trying to open that can of worms again, but just find it interesting.
Thanks for the post.
[/ QUOTE ]
So how many hands does it take where you can say that you are a winning player. I mean, I know that 20K hands is like a drop in the lake/ocean when it comes to varience in Limit hold-em, but it should give you some clue on how well you play.
|