View Single Post
  #35  
Old 09-28-2005, 12:33 AM
Randy_Refeld Randy_Refeld is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Grand Casino - Tunica
Posts: 53
Default Re: betholdem sucks at accounting...

[ QUOTE ]
I don't understand why PITTM is being attacked for this?

It is my understanding that the $120 bonus is exclusively for the sportsbook, and is in a seperate sub-account. He bet the $120, lost it, and that should be it. This is similar to a casino bonus where it has to be rolled over x number of times, but if you put the entire bonus amount on black, and lose it, that's it, you do not have to repay the money. OP should not have had $120 held from his withdrawal.

[/ QUOTE ]

His bonus is based on the size of the deposit he made to the sports book. This is just like a casino bonus. In most of the casinos if you bet the entire bonus on black and lose it isn't over, you cannot withdraw your original deposit until after you make the play through requirement. On this book they allow ou to play poker and sports from the same account, but if you wager the bonus you are supposed to clear it. In this case since there appeared to be a misunderstanding they agreed to give the OP the money to make him happy. Instead of being happy that it was worked out once they determined the problem he came here to complain that he wasn't getting the money fast enough.
Reply With Quote