View Single Post
  #4  
Old 09-26-2005, 08:12 AM
BarronVangorToth BarronVangorToth is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7
Default Re: KK 40-80 against a talker

Mike (I mean, mike), did you mean to write "talker" -- or "taker," in the way that Paul Phillips is a taker?

Typo or not aside, I like the raise as your turn raise could be a way of putting in the bets then rather than 1 then and 1 on the river. Do not four-bet OR fold to his three bet - merely call that.

This all begs the question as to whether you would get more profit by capping it pre-flop. This would maybe cause the SB to check, where the BB MAY take a crack at it, falling into your raise and the SB's inevitable check-reraise.

That, or you would bet the flop, SB would checkraise, you would 3-bet, he would call or four-bet and you would still maybe get the same turn and river action...

Granted, you don't disguise your hand that way - but, given your description of the SB, if he thinks you're "fos" - why not play off that as he won't give your PF cap credit for being AA / KK.

Barron Vangor Toth
BarronVangorToth.com
Reply With Quote