Re: This look right?
[ QUOTE ]
I'd raise a little less PF, for two reasons....it obviously makes it a little easier for you to get off the hand PF, but more importantly, it creates a "managable" pot-size for you to navigate (quite possibly OOP) when you are simply called. At this level, even limping isn't horrible (though I too raise TT from this position).
I personally would have ditched to the reraise PF. OOP...even your 2nd-best flop (rainbow unders), doesn't allow you any viable option. You are partially responsible for creating a pot-size that leaves you no room to "learn" anything. Any reasonable, even "probe'ish type lead by you - you're looking at dumping 1/5th of your remaining stack. And of course a wise check on your part will be quickly followed by his c/b and your fold.
working backward...
- check/fold this flop
- fold PF to the reraise
- raise PF to t80-90ish
[/ QUOTE ]
Ok...I like all the advice except for the "fold to the reraise" part.
For what is essentially a minraise, I am always getting implied odds on my set (and will still have a very manageable stack) Thats my thinking anyhow...Does anyone else feel that this is on the cusp of folding PF or do my implied odds always dictate a call? 10% rule etc...
|