View Single Post
  #1  
Old 09-19-2005, 04:03 AM
Python49 Python49 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 401
Default This final table commentary with Greenstein and Raymer..

Does it seem to anyone else as though greenstein is somewhat cocky in some of the stuff he's saying. He was asked about his strategy in tournaments and ofcourse goes on talking about how he's playing to win just so he can get interviewed and talk about his charities since he's not playing for the money anyway. Well thanks, we already know that, u've said it plenty of times. Actually I am enjoying the commentary but the part that annoyed me was how he sounded like he was talking "down" to raymer. They were discussing accumulating chips based on how tight the other players are playing to make the final table and barry semed as though he didnt understand the point greg was making. Greg was not disagreeing with what barry was saying but barry kept sounded as though he was trying to make a point to prove greg wrong. "Well greg how much experience to you have short handed in big tournaments?" Greg: "Not much". When all greg was trying to do was say that with the two tables joined the players felt better about folding because he felt this made the other players theink they were all losing collectively.

I dunno, I have no problem with barry but this was the vibe I got from that little part of the commentary where it semed as though barry was somewhat "arguing" or trying to prove a point but really greg was not disagreing at all. Greg even said "I would never disagree with that barry but what im saying is..." And barry keeps cutting him off...
Reply With Quote