Re: At Party: January 2005 sign-ups, less than 30% still play there(+
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
One idea would be creating "no-multitable" tables, like there are no-disconnect-protect tables. On these tables, the player would be assured everyone at the table is only playing that one. Ostensibly this can be advertised as "helps the game move faster," but the sub-marketing can emphasize the scuttlebut that "system players" won't be playing there.
[/ QUOTE ]
holy [censored]. this would suck balls.
[/ QUOTE ]
Yes it would. Like any other method to discriminate access to games between the several player types. So, the set of options are:
- Beginners tables (already implemented, are they Party-only?)
- No multi-tabling tables (not a bad idea for Party)
- Limiting the no of hands per player per month per limit at the lower limits (would force migration to higher levels, I'm not sure they can enforce this upon the skins)
- crowding out skin players of whom they do not earn rake and who might on average play tighter and have a higher multitabling ratio by introduction of Party-only bogus Jackpot tables with a drop of 1 cent.
|