Re: Pokerroom vs. Party rake analysis at $2/$4 (Pokerrom 73% higher!)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It makes sense that high limit players can afford to pay more per table hour in rake, since the potential return is much higher. It is confusing to start cutting them breaks and shifting the burden to low limit players.
[/ QUOTE ]
Not to mention that if they bust out the low limit players with a very high rake, those players will never develop into high limit players.
[/ QUOTE ]
Fish always lose, thats why they are fish. In theory you can argue that they will lose faster now with a higher rake, however, if there are less sharks because of the higher rake, they may actually lose at a slower rate.
Low limit players who are profitable, read as sharks, will largely leave the pond (if you guys making noise are to be judged as representative of the silent majority as well).
The ones that remain will reap the benefits. Not nessacerilly in the 2/4 limit games, but in Nl ring, SnGs and perhaps MTTs, the games will actually become more profitable.
In theory.
Phill
|