Re: I am eternally running bad at stud (no content).
[ QUOTE ]
Ahh...the old ad hominem attack. I would have respected your reply far more if you had not implied that I was an "idiot".
How did that add to your argument?
[/ QUOTE ]
Oooooh a big word - ad hominem - wow, I'm impressed.
To answer your question, implieing you were an idoit did not add to my augument. However, you still have not provided the information that you implied you would when you wrote "you first".
So I'm still waiting to see some numbers.
However, impling you were and idiot did not change that fact that making assumptions based on small sample sizes is ill-advised.
|