[KJ o]

[ QUOTE ]
No, it's easier to write a bot that beats anyone HU than it is to write a decent ring game bot, as the HU problem can actually be solved.

[/ QUOTE ]
Duh. That wasn't what we were talking about. (But yes, you are right, HU is easier than full ring.)

[ QUOTE ]
It's not easier for bot nor human to beat a table full of good players than it is to beat a table full of fish.

[/ QUOTE ]

Duh, that wasn't what we were talking about either. There is a difference between beating fish (easy, by the definition of fish) and betaing them for the maximum possible amount (which would require huge amounts of HH and specific learning against particular opponents, as opposed to just good poker).

And why were we discussing this? Because a number of posters indicated that huge amounts of HH or "PT" information would be necessary to build a good bot. Not true.