Re: question for barry
I have a question for Mr. Greenstein.
Barry, It seems like you have some type of personal vendetta against tournament winners and the recognition they recieve. Why is this?
The overexposure of lucky winners is good for poker because it shows that the average person can go up against the pros and get lucky once or twice for a 100k+ payday. Hence, the growth of poker.
Also, do you find the fact that the only watchable poker games are NL hold-em and possibly PL Omaha Hi bad for poker in general? (Like no interest in Limit hold-em/7 card/Omaha hi-lo).
|