[pokergrader]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Mostly the reason I haven't added in more features to PG is that there was little interest in it.

Now there seems to be a huge interest in it, and if this keeps up I will start spending more time adding features and improvements. And the first item on that list is going to be adding support for short handed play (helped by the fact that I've since switched from a ring player to a 6max player [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img])

[/ QUOTE ]

So I gather from these few posts that I maybe shouldn't kill myself over my "D"? I just grabbed the last few weeks of play, which consisted of 6-max, full-ring, and 1 table SNGs (where endgame strategy is wildly different from typical full-ring play). Hmm, I guess a few moments logical thought might have indicated that would skew my results.

I did have the green line across the top saying I made way more than I was supposed to, even though my luck ratings were Bad Luck, Bad Luck, Average Luck. I'll try loading just some ring hands in tonight when I get home and see what I get.

[/ QUOTE ]

I dont think you should kill yourself over any automated site that tries to numerically quantify your poker play. There are just so many variables involved, its difficult to do.

And with PG, if you are dealing with SnGs or short-handed play, the report card is not going to be accurate enough for it to be that helpful.

Everything on the first page should transfer over from full-ring to shorthanded pretty well (SnG support is a little iffy at best), but the report card is based on full ring games.