[KramerTM]

[ QUOTE ]
Additionally the presence of another player all-in means Im going to see his cards no matter what, which might discourage him from bluffing--not to mention that he's still going to have to take down the pot from the other all-in player.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm glad you brought this up. I was about to respond saying that until I read your latest post. It's a great point. You'll be up against 2 overs here about 2 or 3 times more often without that other player all-in. That said, I still don't think it's impossible that he's doing that with AK and hoping the all-in player has overs as well.

Second of all, there's one thing about this hand that truly dictates a call to me:

[ QUOTE ]
I'm the big stack at the table

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you have to call here simply because it's a great hand, and if you're wrong, you won't be out. Sorry you lost th coinflip right after, but you could just as easily won it and been back in the hunt.