[sammy_g]

[ QUOTE ]
Isn't the aim of poker to take the actions you would take if you were able to see your opponent's cards and to force your opponents to not take similar actions and therefore make "mistakes"? (cf. Theory of Poker, Sklansky)

[/ QUOTE ]
No, it's to make the best play against the RANGE of hands your opponents could hold. This is the difference between correct play and "perfect" play. (cf. Ace on the River, Greenstein)

[ QUOTE ]
Therefore, how can you say that I played badly??

[/ QUOTE ]
You're being results oriented.

[ QUOTE ]
I may have had information that you are not exposed to that made me believe I was in front of all villains, and I was right.

[/ QUOTE ]
This is a copout. It's an explaination that cannot be proven/disproven. I see people use this excuse for bad play all the time. Did they show you their cards?

You're being results oriented.

[ QUOTE ]
Regardless, the original aim of this post was not to show how BAD a beat it was... or how bad/great my play was...

[/ QUOTE ]
I don't believe you. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

[ QUOTE ]
it was just to show that 25NL party idiots are willing to go to the felt with junk.

[/ QUOTE ]
We already knew this.

Did I mention you're being results oriented?