Thread: Is a $1/$2 game with $100 max and a $6/half hour session fee beatable?
View Single Post
  #20  
Old 08-15-2005, 06:16 PM
anduril anduril is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 68
Default Re: Is a $1/$2 game with $100 max and a $6/half hour session fee beatable?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


These games play bigger than you think. I big bet in limit is 2 big blinds in NL. The BBs are not the same. Plus you have much bigger pots for the blinds. The rake is not that bad for these games. The 2/4 and such limit games and games in some other countries have real rake problems.

Most 1/2NL games are very soft and beatable. Now you are not going to get rich playing 1/2NL. If you can beat it significantly, it is probably best to play higher.



[/ QUOTE ]
6BB/hour in rake is not that bad? You're insane.


[/ QUOTE ]

I just explained that BB meaning big blinds is not the same as BB meaning big bets in limit. Have you played live no limit?

[/ QUOTE ]

fine. SIX BIG BLINDS PER HOUR for a rake is ridiculous. That's more than a tenth of your stack you're giving up each hour just to play in a game when your stack size is crucial. Is that any clearer? I have played NL live. Do you know what rake is?
Reply With Quote