[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Actually, the chance of hitting a streak grows with the number of tables you play at once (assuming that you do not start another table until your set of games is done). This is because if you are playing 14 tables simultaneously, and we assume you have a 50%ITM average, you might place in 7 tables. The reason this would be a "streak" is because the games where you finish ITM are likely to be longer games than if you bust out in 8th place for example. Meaning (if you can keep your ITM% up as you increase the number of tables you play) you will thus increase the number of tables that you can place consecutively in a "streak".

G

[/ QUOTE ]

This is the dubest thread Ive seen in a while...beside's codewarrior, you guys are all talking past eachother and speaking verbal vomit.

If you multitable, SNGs should be recorded by their start time, not finish...so there goes that dumb theory.

Multitablers dont have a better chance of a streak over x amount of games than a single tabler over x games. As one genius pointed out, the likelihood of an ITM streak of y games over 10,000 sngs is greater than one over 100 games...thanks, but what does that have to do with multitabling?

ugh

[/ QUOTE ]

nh.

[ QUOTE ]
This is from 4 tabling the 22's.
Copied straight from spreadsheet.

SNG# DATE DAY TIME PLACING DURATION
214 13-Jul We 4:15 AM 1 40
215 13-Jul We 4:15 AM 1 53
216 13-Jul We 4:15 AM 3 41
217 19-Jul Tu 2:43 AM 1 54
218 19-Jul Tu 2:43 AM 1 43
219 19-Jul Tu 2:45 AM 2 47
220 19-Jul Tu 2:46 AM 1 52
221 20-Jul We 2:06 AM 1 54
222 20-Jul We 2:06 AM 1 48
223 20-Jul We 2:06 AM 1 42
224 20-Jul We 2:06 AM 1 55
225 22-Jul Fr 4:33 AM 2 35


[/ QUOTE ]

JESUS!

6 straight for me, mostly 3rds : puke :