[citanul]

Praying,

Harrington touches on this idea though also, and I'm wondering what you think:

He says that the more aggressive the opponent is, the more wary you should be about their check on the flop here. Basically, an aggressive opponent is betting everything, and well, your 99 might even be worth a value raise here, but a predictable weak tighty guy, you should probably be less wary of their check because they are checking flops they miss.

Clearly both people have the ability to mix it up (although sometimes not, sometimes in their super aggressiveness or their weak-tightishness, they become so predictable they don't even mix up their style) but these factors seem to overwhelm the others.

citanul