[primetime32]

that was my point. Rakebackreview does a good job, but there are tons of options and i dont think its that clear which one is better than the other, outside of the percentages offered and some tools the site may have. I havent read too much about the credibility of each site or if any of them have been more reliable than others in terms of payouts etc..

that type of info could only be shared amongst users, and we seem to have a bunch of users here. If 20 respected posters said they used site X and loved it, then people may be more inclined to use that site. If some people came forward with bad stories about site Y, some of us would be on alert as to possible problems.

Like everything on the internet you never know who is full of it or not. Maybe someone will complain about a rakeback site because they are the competition. But we, the users, should be the ones deciphering what is what.

Something is better than nothing.