I\'ll answer yours if you answer mine!
Suppose Phil enters 100 tournaments in a year. Also suppose he made the money in 12 of these tourneys, reached 8 final tables and won 2 but did not cash in the $10K WSOP. Would this show him to be a superstar a vastly superior player, an above average player, just an average player or below average player?
One more question, suppose Phil won the $10K WSOP and that was the only tournament he entered or played in that year. What status if any does this give him? Particularly when compared to the initial annual scenario I provided above.
One comment about your disclaimer, when people ask you not to use an arguement in thier rebuttal it is usually because they do not understand it's application to the relevant arguement. Not saying this is true in your case, you may be the 10,000 to 1 anomaly. [img]/forums/images/icons/smile.gif[/img]
|