Re: Sartre\'s Contradiction
[ QUOTE ]
For the most part philosophy is for people who are not smart enough to tackle tough questions that have indisputable answers. But unlike artists, linguists, etc they want to pretend otherwise. (Exceptions: Descarte, Leibniz, Russell.)
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't get this...
Do you mean to say the following two things:
1. For the most part, philosophers aren't smart enough to solve tough mathematical and/or scientific questions that can be 'proven'?
2. *And* instead, they spend time investigating answers to tough questions that cannot be 'proven' but think that they *are* proving the answers?
If so, I don't think this is the case at all.
Aside comment: a unique aspect of philosophy is that it fundamentally encompasses any other academic discipline or way of thinking....with the right background in philosophy and/or tools resulting from analytical thought in it, one will likely be even better prepared to tackle tough questions that either have or don't have 'provable' answers.
Yugoslav
|