View Single Post
  #5  
Old 07-19-2005, 07:07 PM
binions binions is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4
Default Re: Adapting Miller\'s GSIH short-stack strategy to 6max tables.

[ QUOTE ]
I've really enjoyed using the GSIH short-stack strategy in full-ring games from 400NL up to 2000NL (although I get a little gunshy there at the very top when sticking in $400 with just an overpair).
The thing is, though that at nearly all of those levels, there are FAR more 6-max tables going than full 10-max tables...much easier to find a seat, especially mid-day...also much easier to jump around tables...and I'm wondering whether there's been discussion on this forum or elsewhere about whether the strategy needs adapting to short-handed games...after all, I can't just wait around to get one of the top 5 premium hands and let the blinds eat me up (or can I??). Has this been discussed here at all...Mr. Miller, care to chime in??

[/ QUOTE ]

I have played a fair amount on 6 handed tables.

For starting hands, I use Ed's middle hands 3 and 2 off the button, and Ed's late hands in the cutoff and button.

It is my experience that you are called more more often short-handed, and therefore face a wider variety of hands. In addition, players often raise with weaker hands than they would raise with in the same position 10 handed.

Because you are not sacrificing hand strength and will get more action on your raises, make them pay to play. Your initial raise should be higher than your normal raise at a 10 handed table.

I am experimenting with the following theory short-handed: if called, your goal should be to have enough stack left over to make a pot sized all-in bet on the flop. So, with a 25xBB stack, make your initial raise 8xBB. With a 20xBB stack, raise 6xBB, etc.

With respect to the weaker than normal raises made by others, here is where you have to pay attention and make notes. Once you know someone loosens their raising standards, you can add 99 and AQ to your reraising hands for that player.
Reply With Quote