Re: Some math that\'s supposed to help me figure out SNGs
Of course I'm not aiming for more thirds than firsts.
What you're saying is to pass on a hand where you're a big dog because you can get a big edge later on. That makes perfect sense. Simple gambling concept to maximize EV.
What I'm saying is you'd be WILLING to take a gamble where you're 3-1 against winning. Sure, you can have a bigger edge later on, but taking this gamble still isn't bad.
But what I'm also saying is that's wrong. The reason I'm saying it's wrong is because ICM is telling me it's wrong. I'm trying to understand WHY it's wrong.
|