Re: Interesting cheating post
I don't see anything suspicious about it. Just the opposite. If the other guy had not had JJ, then Doyle and Ted would have had to turn their cards over anyway, right? So they knew there would be no hiding of anything. Plus, if they were sharing a bankroll, I don't see how it would help their team to intentionally remove a team member.
If it they were not cheating, and it was a bad play on Doyle's part followed by a bad play on Ted's part (I have no opinion on either play), then wooptidoo. Somebody played bad. Big deal. If they were cheating, then I do have an opinion. They aren't very good at it.
Tommy
|