View Single Post
  #60  
Old 07-14-2005, 11:58 AM
Easy E Easy E is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,449
Default Re: WSOP Day 6: \"Official\" News, Results, and Discussion

Anyone who whines about the Official post of the day should lie down and suck on their pacifier.

I was formatting a similar list before I saw this post. I calculated total chip counts by table when I was doing so

[ QUOTE ]

Mike Matusow 5,140,000 117 1
Michael Kessler 2,700,000 117 2
Shahram Sheikhan 310,000 117 3
Johnny Howard 730,000 117 4
Aaron Kanter 1,925,000 117 5
Tom Sartori 805,000 117 6
Conor Tate 1,265,000 117 7
Tiffany Williamsen 1,125,000 117 8
Brad Kondracki 3,160,000 117 9

Total chips $17,160,000

Fossilman 3,840,000 118 1
Tim Phan 1,575,000 118 2
Scott Lazar 3,025,000 118 3
Per Hildebrand 645,000 118 4
Ayhan Alsancak 225,000 118 5
Phil Ivey 4,635,000 118 6
Joseph Hachem 3,125,000 118 7
Andrew Black 2,090,000 118 8
Joe Connor 1,065,000 118 9

Total chips $20,225,000

John McGrane 575,000 129 1
Bernard Lee 710,000 129 2
Tommy Vu 1,870,000 129 3
Tex Barch 3,900,000 129 4
Bryant King 1,440,000 129 5
Daniel Bergsdorf 2,550,000 129 6
Oskar Silow 1,440,000 129 7
Steven Dannenmann 4,300,000 129 8
Minh Ly 2,050,000 129 9

Total chips $18,835,000

[/ QUOTE ]

Sum of chips for all three tables $56,220,000. With 5619 entries, that's very close to the expected total of chips. Wasn't there some question about this at one point in the last week? Maybe it was on RGP

I take it that they do not try to balance the tables as evenly as possible, as far as total chip counts?

Anyone think that the extra $2M in chips available to table 118 is an advantage? Or will the players move enough so that this won't matter?