View Single Post
  #6  
Old 07-11-2005, 02:59 AM
bolgenmod bolgenmod is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 26
Default Re: ESPN or Harrington

I believe there might be some confusion about two different hands. In one, Harrington puts the squeeze on Arieh opening with a raise, Raymer coldcalling, and Harrington reraising with junk. Both fold to Harrington. (I think Raymer even makes a remark -- not in the book -- about how he doesn't have aces and thus can't call! But if I remember the "Raymer commentary" final table correctly, Raymer didn't really remember the hand!)

The other hand has Farha with 22, Lester with 77, Harrington with KK (I think I've got the pocket pairs right, but I'm not going to go digging into HOH to verify!). Harrington says he was thinking squeeze play, but then he looks at his hand and wow, a good hand. So he overbet, thinking about a squeeze play, but also that Farha or Lester might call thinking that Harrington was squeezing with an inferior hand or perhaps AK/AQ. Farha did fold, but Lester called. When the flop came low, Lester pushed and doubled up Harrington.

Harrington writes something like to those who didn't know (read commentators) we looked like amateurs, me making an overbet that Lester would have to assume was a premium pair and would thus fold. But I knew that Lester (who knew Harrington's play) would think I was making a move. So both of us played correctly: I knew he would think I was on a steal, but I actually had a hand, so I trapped him.

Funny thing is that when I read HOH, I remembered seeing these hands on TV. The first really impressed me because I could see what he was doing: he clearly thought a reraise from him would fold the two aggressive players if they didn't have a great hand. The second I didn't understand (I thought the same thing: overbet!) until I read HOH. Not much of a compliment as I don't play much No-limit and few tournaments, but when I read stuff like this, I REALLY know how little I know!
Reply With Quote