[bkbluedevil]

Vegas banning people who can beat blackjack is different than party poker banning people who beat their games in several ways. Most notably, the people who beat blackjack cost the casino money while the people who beat party poker games are it's biggest cutomers, and the people who pay the most in fees (I've already paid over 1100 in rake this month and I'm not even close to people like Gramps, Nick B and Raptor.) Also if vegas can litterally ban everyone who can beat their games consistently while if party poker bans the current sharks the breakeven players would then become the big winners. In other words: someone has to win in poker, no one has to win in blackjack.