[drewjustdrew]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This was where I got that from. Maybe I'm misinterpreting it, but DN later discusses risking chips, moreso than keeping players at the table. Maybe neither of us (me and Daniel, that is) have our facts straight???

[/ QUOTE ]

Read it again. According to Daniel, Jack says "I shouldn't have called with those KK because I could have gone to the final table with even more chips than I did had I folded."

Remember, Jack *won* the hand. He says that even though he called the all-in and WON he would have ended up with more chips if he had folded. Obviously he is talking about folding to preserve the bubble, not folding because of the risk of losing a big pot.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think it wasn't to preserve the bubble, so much as to preserve consolidating the tables.