Re: 4-tabling vs 2-tabling
Some people can multitask better and will even maintain close to the same winrates playing more tables. Others may be completely lost and 3BB/100 may turn into a losing player.
Since I only have information that is valuable for full ring, I will share. I am a great multitasker. I was originally playing 4 full tables and beating it at 2.5bb/100. Then I moved to a stage where I played anywhere from 8-12 tables. My winrate still stayed above 2 for a while and eventually climbed to over 2.5bb/100, presumably as I became a better player.
Since this will probably affect shorthanded play more, the information above is only useful to some point.
FWIW, I've only tried 6tabling shorthanded games as that's what I've been recommended to do, and it doesn't seem too hard.
It just affects everyone differently.
|