I was reading an article regarding the success of Todd Brunson on the ESPN Poker sub-site and came across an interesting quote:
"It's totally meaningless,'' Todd says. "It only recently became a big deal. What matters is if you win or lose. It's how you do at the end of the year. You see these guys win – I want to name somebody, but I won't – he wins all kinds of bracelets and at the end of the year, he's broke every year since I've know him for 15 years. No matter how much money he wins, I wind up with all of it. He wins all the bracelets, comes to play, then I get his money (in cash games).''
Found it an interesting quote and since this forum seems like the place where cryptic talk like this is decoded I thought I'd give you guys a crack at it. Personally, I'm stumped, maybe he's talking about Chan? Maybe Hellmuth, but Phil doesn't play in the same games as Todd, so I have to eliminate him.
I'm going with Chan.
Link to article.
Todd Brunson Article