View Single Post
  #113  
Old 06-21-2005, 07:54 PM
GFunk911 GFunk911 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 56
Default Re: Followup Response

[ QUOTE ]
4. This is the potentially controversial point (though it shouldn't be): Playing a large stack, in general, holds no intrinsic advantage over playing a small one. Take the AVERAGE (in every way) no limit player and give him a deep stack. Have him play many, many hours of NL. Then give him a short stack and have him do the same. His long-term results should be roughly the same, break-even (excluding the rake) for all stack sizes.


[/ QUOTE ]

Ed, can you clarify this? I assume you mean that, give a player a big stack (AND ALL THE OTHER PLAYERS THE SAME SIZED STACK), as opposed to giving a player a short stack (and all the other players the same sized stack).

Is this what you meant?
Reply With Quote