Re: Sklansky -Fermat Conjectures
Conjecture Two: If there are in fact q's for which the conjecture holds, some will be formally unprovable.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That doesn't look like a conjecture. That looks like a guess. I'd bet $1k against it, even money.
My point is that I think there are qs for which the conjecture holds for no logical "reason" other than "sparseness".
|