Re: Right number of bets?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
But FWIW, I think KQ[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], KJ[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], KT[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], QJ[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], JT[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], or QT[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] are all possibilities, alongside AA, AxK [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], AxQ [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], AJ.
[/ QUOTE ]
I would agree if he had limped PF. I just don't see too many players at the Party 2/4 (and I won't give them credit for it if they're unknown) raising these types of hands out of the blinds PF.
[/ QUOTE ]
I see bizzarre hands raised all the time. Its strange what a 40/10 or whatever actually chooses to raise PF with.
-SmileyEH
|