What is wrong with the PNAC? I've only read a few articles but the ones I've read were spectacular IMO.
One of the last articles I've read was this one:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraq-20040623.htm
Which in my opinion could not of been much better. It's hard for me not to like an article that has 47 sources. It's also hard for me not to like an article made almost completely up of quotes taken in context.
Why is this place hated so much? Please do not say "ooooo you know who founded that website?" I don't give a crap who's behind it. Show me what is so wrong with the information/logic please.
-inspired by nothumbs OOT post.