Re: KJo in the BB
[ QUOTE ]
This assumes that KJo can be assigned +EV from this position in the first place. A line has to be drawn for the hands that are worthy of a bet in the BB.
With three limpers, a hand like KJ is vulnerable to domination.
Domination by what?
It's dominated by AJ, AK, KQ, JJ, KK, and AA.
Which one of those is limping in here?
[/ QUOTE ]
Less than 12 hours ago you were trying to tell me that "lots of people limp with JJ". Here I will quote exactly your words from the discussion on the other forum.
[ QUOTE ]
Anyway, the postflop action, do you really want to be three-betting top two on this turn with no reads?
Lots of people limp with JJ.
[/ QUOTE ]
That is exactly what you said. And just now, on this forum, you ask me if JJ is limping here. Have you taken your medication?
Anyway, JJ isn't usually limping here. But at a loose passive table, KQ and AJ are.
I'm going to bed. You can stay up all night and try to convince people that KJ in the BB against three limpers has an equity edge.
But you will have to stop contradicting yourself first.
Goodnight
|